Is my Claude Code app safe to launch?
Paste your address. We check your live Claude Code app the way a stranger would, then tell you in plain English what could cost you money, and how to fix it.
Free. No sign-up. We check the one page you give us, and only what any visitor can already see.
Your app takes a visitor at their word about who they are.
Working is not the same as safe.
Claude Code writes and changes real code in a real project from instructions in plain English. It is capable enough that founders ship whole products with it, which is precisely why the result deserves checking: the app is as safe as the code, and the code is now written faster than anyone reads it.
Tools like this one write ordinary code, so a finished app carries no sign of which editor built it. That changes nothing about the check: we look at what your app actually does, not at what wrote it.
The faults we find in Claude Code apps.
Written the way your own report would write them. These live in the app Claude Code built for you, not in Claude Code’s own service, which is why only a check of your app answers it.
Anyone on the internet can read your customer list.
A stranger can run up your bill with nothing to stop them.
What this check cannot see.
Every scanner looks cleaner if it stays quiet about what it missed. We would rather tell you.
Because the code is the app, the deepest version of this check reads your project, which needs you to connect it. From just an address we check everything reachable from outside and tell you which questions we could not answer.
A real case, on the record.
Georgia Tech’s tracker of real security holes traced to AI-written code attributed 27 of its 74 confirmed cases to Claude Code, the largest share of any single tool. Read that carefully: it reflects how much code the tool writes, not a higher rate of mistakes per line, and the researchers behind it say the true total across every tool is five to ten times what they can trace. The useful conclusion is not that one tool is unsafe. It is that code written this fast, by any of them, is going out unchecked.
You found something. Now what?
Claude Code can make every one of these changes if you tell it precisely what to ask for, which is most of the value of a report written in plain sentences rather than error codes.
The free check names each fault and shows the proof from your live app. Paying gets you the wording to paste back, and a re-check that tells you whether it is actually gone rather than whether the edit was made.
Fix it inside Claude Code, without copying anything.
Connect us to Claude Code once, and you never move between two windows again. You say “check my app and fix what you find” in Claude Code itself, and it asks us directly: what is wrong, the exact wording to fix it, then a second check to prove it worked.
It reads, it does not write. We never touch your app ourselves. Claude Code makes the change, with you watching.
Questions from people who built with Claude Code.
- Claude Code is careful about security. Why would there be anything to find?
- Because most of these are not coding mistakes. A table with no rule on it is a setting in your database that no code touches, and a key in the browser is usually put there to make something work at the time. Careful code sits on top of decisions nobody made.
- Can you check the parts that only run on my server?
- From your web address alone, no, and the report says so rather than implying it looked. Reading the server side means connecting your code, which is part of a paid plan. That is where the expensive faults live, like a charge with no limit on it, because they never show on the site.
- I use Claude Code across several projects. Do I need to check each one?
- Yes, because the answer is about the app rather than the tool. The same person using the same tool produces an exposed app one week and a safe one the next, depending on which questions came up while building it.