Is my Claude Code app safe to launch?
Paste your address. We check your live Claude Code app the way a stranger would, then tell you in plain English what could cost you money, and how to fix it.
Free. No sign-up. We only look at what any visitor can already see.
Your app takes a visitor at their word about who they are.
Working is not the same as safe.
Claude Code writes and changes real code in a real project from instructions in plain English. It is capable enough that founders ship whole products with it, which is precisely why the result deserves checking: the app is as safe as the code, and the code is now written faster than anyone reads it.
Tools like this one write ordinary code, so a finished app carries no sign of which editor built it. That changes nothing about the check: we look at what your app actually does, not at what wrote it.
The faults we find in Claude Code apps.
Written the way your own report would write them. These live in the app Claude Code built for you, not in Claude Code’s own service, which is why only a check of your app answers it.
Your app takes a visitor at their word about who they are.
Anyone on the internet can read your customer list.
A stranger can run up your bill with nothing to stop them.
What this check cannot see.
Every scanner looks cleaner if it stays quiet about what it missed. We would rather tell you.
A real case, on the record.
Georgia Tech’s tracker of real security holes traced to AI-written code attributed 27 of its 74 confirmed cases to Claude Code, the largest share of any single tool. Read that carefully: it reflects how much code the tool writes, not a higher rate of mistakes per line, and the researchers behind it say the true total across every tool is five to ten times what they can trace. The useful conclusion is not that one tool is unsafe. It is that code written this fast, by any of them, is going out unchecked.